As a cishet male, it took me a long time to realize that just meant “cisgender heterosexual.”
But if we’re talking acronyms, it could have accurately stood for “cargo-included shorts / hides emotions terribly” as well.
we can forgive you for not knowing what cishet is but cargo shorts? that is too far
I’m hoping to get a pardon due to extenuating circumstances on this one.
You see, as a white cishet guy who regularly shaves off all my hair, wearing cargo shorts is about the most overt way I can think of to broadcast to everyone in the vicinity:
DO NOT BE ALARMED! THIS HUGE NERD IS OBVIOUSLY NOT A SKINHEAD!
wait… what does trans stand for then?
They stand for each other and for a world without fear
Flavoracle definitely has a third eye and it’s wide open honey
Gee i dunno, maybe the way they had her spread her legs and make an o-face???
She has to pose, he gets to play
Asking “what’s sexual about this” is almost insidous. Sure, she’s not naked and she’s not performing any sexual acts, but that’s not what sexualization necessarily means. The girl-child is looking longinly,
languishingly into the camera. She has her legs in a short dress spread, her lips separated, and very much make-up making her look older. She is passive, for the camera/viewer, while the boy is active, joking, playing, relaxed and as a child, respected as a child. I’m sure someone might say, “but that’s you sexualizing her, with your gaze” but come on, who are we kidding here? We know the industry sexualizes young girls, we know this isn’t a coinscidence. We know this is the pattern, the model for woman according to the male gaze or woman performing for the male gaze, and we know she is 13 and that everyone knows she is. And we know this destroys girls.
bongdanceking 